(Columbia) The State. Aug. 10, 2021.
Editorial: Infrastructure bill compromise by senators means more dollars for SC roads, bridges
Chances are you’ve driven on a bumpy, pothole-laden road or rickety bridge and wondered will this ever be fixed?
Finally, we have hope that some federal dollars are coming to save the day or at the very least save the wear and tear on our cars and trucks.
On Tuesday, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham joined 18 other republican senators in support of the Biden Administration’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan. The plan, with a vote of 69-30 in the senate, now heads to the House of Representatives for consideration.
“The bipartisan infrastructure bill is good for South Carolina,” Graham Tweeted just after the vote was taken.
He added, “It provides much-needed help for our roads, bridges, ports, and expands broadband internet access.I have always been supportive of infrastructure investment and wish we had passed this years ago.”
Now, we know there is no such thing as the perfect piece of legislation, but here we have a welcome example of our elected officials working to reach a compromise that ultimately will benefit the American people.
The infrastructure bill, which is focused on bridge and road repair, electric vehicle charging station expansion and broadband access, would bring nearly $10 billion to South Carolina, according to estimates from the Biden administration.
Nearly $5 billion is designated for improvements to public transportation options across the Palmetto State. Another $4.6 billion would go to highway improvements, and $274 million would go to bridge repairs.
Democrats and Republicans have spent months negotiating the bill as it appears today, with Republicans arguing that earlier versions of the bill set aside funds for what they deemed non-infrastructure-related projects. Democrats pushed back focusing provisions designed to curb climate change and expand access to broadband.
South Carolina’s junior Sen. Tim Scott did not join Graham in voting for the measure, explaining in a press release that he supports investment in the country’s roads, bridges, ports, broadband, and other infrastructure needs, “But I cannot support more reckless spending on unrelated pet projects that will suffocate our future generations with mountains of debt.”
Scott added, “Rather than taking a common sense approach to investing in infrastructure, this bill has been rushed through so Democrats can spend trillions more dollars we don’t have on liberal policies we don’t need—all amid record inflation. American families cannot afford to foot the bill for this ‘spend now, tax later’ plan, which is why I voted no.”.
Graham cited several benefits of the bill for South Carolinians including $4.6 billion in highway funding, the $274 million in bridge replacement and rehabilitation funding, and $70 million to assist in the deployment of electric vehicles and charging stations over the next five years.
He noted that the bill features the BuyAmerican.gov provision he co-sponsored, which promotes easier access for South Carolina businesses to view and apply for government procurement contracts.
We welcome Sen. Graham’s vote and we hope our South Carolina representatives in the House join in the effort to bring much-needed money to our state.
Compromise is about making concessions and we want our elected leaders to recognize that in this case compromise means that 5.1 million South Carolinians can benefit from better roads, improved transportation and broadband access for all.
The (Charleston) Post and Courier. Aug. 8, 2021.
Editorial: Murdaugh boat investigation highlights problems police need to fix
The mysterious murders of Maggie Murdaugh and her son, Paul, put an end to the criminal case against Mr. Murdaugh, who was facing a felony boating under the influence charge in the 2019 death of 19-year-old Mallory Beach. But it didn’t put an end to questions about how state and local law enforcement officials handled the investigation of the boating accident.
To the contrary, Paul Murdaugh’s death seems to have released a treasure trove of evidence that officials had been able to hide from the public while the case was pending.
Although there are legitimate reasons to temporarily withhold certain types of investigative material that could be used in a criminal trial, the information about the Murdaugh investigation paints a deeply disturbing picture of the S.C. Department of Natural Resources and the Beaufort County Sheriff’s Office. And in so doing, it once again demonstrates how law enforcement sometimes benefits most from the secrecy, by keeping its missteps out of the public view.
Consider this damning introduction to last month’s article by The Post and Courier’s Stephen Hobbs and Thad Moore:
“Within hours of the early morning boat crash that killed Mallory Beach, an officer investigating the incident spoke with the missing teen’s boyfriend. The man said the boat’s driver was Paul Murdaugh, a 19-year-old from a line of prominent lawyers who long held sway over the South Carolina Lowcountry. The officer did not write in his report that Murdaugh was implicated. Instead, he wrote that Beach’s boyfriend said he didn’t know who was driving. And he told his supervisor he suspected someone else entirely.”
The article went on to explain that, “Some evidence was apparently not collected, statements weren’t documented in reports and incomplete information was passed along to supervisors.”
For example: Beaufort County deputies, who arrived first at the scene of the accident, did not conduct a sobriety test on the obviously drunk Mr. Murdaugh or any other passengers — the sort of thing police ought to do automatically in an automobile accident; one later told investigators that was the job of the Department of Natural Resources.
But by the time a DNR agent arrived, all but one of the surviving passengers had been taken to the hospital. The agent said he did not attempt to test Mr. Murdaugh’s sobriety, but a separate agent, and the lead investigator on the case, said Mr. Murdaugh refused to be tested. Investigators might not have been able to bring charges but for the fact that the hospital staff was so worried about the level of Mr. Murdaugh’s intoxication that they conducted a blood test.
The officer who wrote in his report that Ms. Beach’s boyfriend said he didn’t know who was driving later testified that he didn’t know why he put that clearly incorrect information in his report, but a military officer on the scene said he heard Natural Resources agents discussing how prominent and powerful the Murdaugh family was.
The wife of one DNR officer had been employed by the Murdaugh law firm until eight months prior to the crash. One of the Beaufort County deputies who failed to gather evidence at the scene had received a $750,000 settlement in a lawsuit the Murdaughs filed on behalf of his mother and him.
At the very least, the new documents suggest that the Natural Resources Department has not properly prepared its officers to conduct criminal investigations of this type. This is particularly troublesome since the officers involved are part of a special team trained to investigate boating accidents. As ever more people flock to our beaches and rivers and lakes and as boating becomes ever more popular and boaters become ever more reckless, it’s ever more important for the agency to make sure its officers are properly trained to investigate deadly accidents.
The documents also suggest that local police give too much deference to the state agency in criminal investigations. Although there are significant differences between boating accidents and traffic accidents, there are some basic principles that apply in both cases — starting with the importance of preserving evidence that might not be available later. That includes conducting field sobriety tests on the driver — or on multiple people if it’s not clear who the driver was. DNR needs to make it clear to local police — and sheriffs and police chiefs need to make it clear to their officers — that they should start gathering evidence when they’re the first to arrive on the scene.
Those are the easy fixes.
The more difficult one involves the close ties between investigator and investigated. Certainly the Murdaugh family is an outlier: a powerful and even feared family that has cultivated close ties with small-town law enforcement that, whether intended or not, increase the likelihood of favoritism, even if that favoritism is only a matter of giving the benefit of the doubt to a family member.
But there are less extreme examples in every community in our state, and South Carolina needs better policies in place to ensure that potential conflicts of interest are identified immediately and procedures put in place to keep those conflicts from interfering with justice being done.
The (Greenwood) Index-Journal. Aug. 10, 2021.
Editorial: Your freedom, your choice
Yes, we believe in individuals’ freedoms and their right to make their own choices.
We also believe in science, experts in the medical field and research that provides us the means to protect our health. Consider the many advances made in the field of health care thanks to research and science.
Polio has very nearly been eradicated from the globe thanks to research and the development of a vaccine. Ponder the many surgical procedures and transplants that can be done today that could only be imagined not so many years ago.
By all means, we need to uphold our individual freedoms above all else. At least, that seems to be a rallying cry among many who oppose face mask mandates and vaccinations in these COVID-19 days.
Applying this line of thinking, let’s now look at other areas where our individual rights are quashed on a daily basis and include them in our stance for our liberties:
— No medical professional ought to have to wash his or her hands and arms, wear scrubs and a face covering when performing surgery. Granted, this speaks to your overall health and the health of others, but …
— No restaurant should have to follow DHEC guidelines or be punished for not doing so. It’s their right to operate free and clear of annoying rules and regs. It’s your right to choose whether to eat at their establishments. Granted, this speaks to your overall health and the health of others, but …
— Government should not dictate what speed you should drive on the roads, highways and interstates. Granted, this speaks to your overall health and the health of others, but …
— Come to think of it, seat belts should be a personal choice, along with whether to text and drive. Granted, this speaks to your overall health and the health of others, but …
— Government ought not dictate that pharmaceutical companies spell out possible side effects of the drugs we choose to take, nor should food manufacturers be required to provide warnings of potential allergy risks. Granted, this speaks to your overall health and the health of others, but …
— There should be no warning labels on household cleaners, either. Granted, this speaks to your overall health and the health of others, but …
— There should be no penalty for a parent or guardian who leaves a loaded weapon within reach of a child and that child or someone else in the household dies or is seriously injured in an accidental shooting. Granted, this speaks to the child’s overall well-being and the well-being of others, but …
Sounds more than a tad ridiculous, right?
Consider what our own state’s governor, Henry McMaster, said Monday morning. He acknowledged that face coverings can prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus to others, but he doesn’t want to mandate the wearing of face masks in public schools — despite that more and more younger people and school-aged children are contracting the virus that, in turn, they might pass on to others.
He acknowledged that the vaccine is a good thing, even noting that in the event a person does get the virus, the effects are far less serious for those who are vaccinated.
All good, but all a matter of individual or parental choice. So a parent making the choice not to make a child wear a face mask at school is OK, even if it might mean the child unknowingly is spreading the virus to classmates and teachers, who in turn might spread it to others. Especially if that child is not yet eligible to receive a vaccination.
And is that list any more ridiculous than, say, the overflowing line of cars with people wanting a COVID test at Self versus the extremely short line — maybe four or five — of cars with people wanting to get vaccinated?
Granted, a vaccinated person could wind up with the virus and need tested. Granted, some people have legitimate reasons beyond freedom of choice to bypass the vaccine. However, we’d be willing to bet that if more people got vaccinated when it was available, the line for testing would have been far shorter.
But when did Americans’ individual freedoms and liberties negate the health and well-being of the rest of the citizenry? When did we come to the conclusion that even though masks do lower a health risk, we ought not mandate they be worn in public schools?
The (Orangeburg) Times and Democrat. Aug. 6, 2021.
Editorial: Agreement on preventing youth suicide
Lawmakers from liberal to conservative agree that action taken by the S.C. General Assembly in 2021 to prevent suicide among young people is a necessary step.
Gov. Henry McMaster was joined by Lt. Gov. Pamela S. Evette, members of the General Assembly and state leaders for a ceremonial bill signing of S.231, the Student Identification Card Suicide Prevention Act. The act requires public schools serving seventh through 12th grade and public and private institutions of higher learning to provide the phone number of the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline and an additional crisis resource of their choosing on school-issued student identification cards.
“This law not only provides our students with easy access to a vital resource, it will also serve as a daily reminder that they are not alone,” McMaster said. “Through the work of the South Carolina Department of Mental Health and many others, South Carolina has developed statewide infrastructure to support those in need. We must continue to fight to end the stigma surrounding mental health issues and work to ensure all South Carolinians know how to reach out for help.”
Passage of the legislation comes amid research that shows the rate of suicide among those ages 10 to 24 increased nearly 60% between 2007 and 2018. The rise occurred in most states, with 42 experiencing significant increases, a 2020 report from the Centers from Disease Control shows.
The suicide rate increased from 6.8 per 100,000 in 2007 to 10.7 in 2018. The report compared three-year averages of suicide rates for 2007-09 and 2016-18 and found:
— The 2016-18 suicide rate among persons aged 10-24 was highest for Alaska (31.4 per 100,000).
— Even states with the lowest rates experienced significant increases: New Jersey had an increase of 39%, New York about 44% and Massachusetts about 64%.
In addition to connecting students with the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, each school in South Carolina is to add the social media platform, telephone number or text number for at least one other resource that best fits the needs of their school or community. Options include, but are not limited to, the Crisis Text Line, National Teen Dating Abuse Helpline, a local suicide prevention hotline, campus police or local law enforcement.
The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline provides free and confidential emotional support to people in suicidal crisis or emotional distress 24 hours a day, seven days a week, across the United States. The Lifeline is comprised of a national network of over 180 local crisis centers, combining custom local care and resources with national standards and best practices. The number for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255.
“On the surface, this bill just looks like a number on the back of an ID card, but in reality, it is a lifeline,” Director of S.C. Department of Mental Health Dr. Ken Rogers said. “It is something that young people will be able to look at and know there is a number to call to get help.”
The bottom line as stated by Lexington Republican Sen. Katrina Shealy: “This act will save lives. It will put valuable resources directly into the hands of our young people who oftentimes don’t know where to turn in times of personal crisis.”
South Carolina is the ninth state to pass student identification card suicide prevention legislation. More should follow.
Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.